data Breach

Data Breach Hack [Video]

data BreachData breach

Posted by: Margaret Rouse

Personal Health Information, Personally Identifiable Information, Trade Secrets, Intellectual Property

Hacking, Unauthorised

The most common concept of a data breach is an attacker hacking into a corporate network to steal sensitive data. However, not all data breaches are so dramatic. If an unauthorized hospital employee views a patient’s health information on a computer screen over the shoulder of an authorized employee, that also constitutes a data breach.A number of industry guidelines and government compliance regulations mandate strict governance of sensitive or personal data to avoid data breaches. Within a corporate environment, for example, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) dictates who may handle and use sensitive PII such as credit card numbers, PINs and bank account numbers in conjunction with names and addresses. Within a healthcare environment, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulates who may see and use PHI such as name, date of birth, Social Security number and health history information.

If anyone who is not specifically authorized to do so views such information, the corporation or healthcare organization charged with protecting that information is said to have suffered a data breach. If a data breach results in identity theft and/or a violation of government or industry compliance mandates, the offending organization may face fines or other civil or criminal prosecution.

…read more

Source: TechTatget

Security Breach

Service providers are required to notify the ICO if a ‘personal data breach’ occurs. They must also notify customers if the breach is likely to adversely affect customers’ privacy, and keep a breach log. 

What is a ‘personal data breach’?

A personal data breach is a breach of security leading to the accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, unauthorised disclosure of, or access to, personal data transmitted, stored or otherwise processed in connection with the provision of a public electronic communications service.

A personal data breach may mean that someone other than the data controller gets unauthorised access to personal data. But a personal data breach can also occur if there is unauthorised access within an organisation, or if a data controller’s own employee accidentally alters or deletes personal data.

What must we do if there is a breach?

Service providers (eg telecoms providers or internet service providers) have certain obligations if a personal data breach occurs. These are set out in regulation 5A.

If you are a service provider, you must:

  • notify the ICO;
  • consider whether to notify your customers; and
  • record details in your own breach log.

When and how do we notify the ICO?

You must notify the ICO within 24 hours of becoming aware of the essential facts of the breach. This notification must include at least:

  • your name and contact details;
  • the date and time of the breach (or an estimate);
  • the date and time you detected it;
  • basic information about the type of breach; and
  • basic information about the personal data concerned.

Please use our breach notification form (this form sets a cookie). You can attach documents to the form if necessary.

If possible, you should also include full details of the incident, the number of individuals affected and its possible effect on them, the measures taken to mitigate those effects, and information about your notification to customers. If these details are not yet available, you must provide them as soon as possible. You must submit a second notification form to us within three days, either including these details, or telling us how long it will take you to get them.

Failure to submit breach notifications can incur a £1,000 fine.

When and how do we notify our customers?

If the breach is likely to adversely affect the personal data or privacy of your subscribers or users, you need to notify them of the breach without unnecessary delay. You need to tell them:

  • your name and contact details;
  • the estimated date of the breach;
  • a summary of the incident;
  • the nature and content of the personal data;
  • the likely effect on the individual;
  • any measures you have taken to address the breach; and
  • how they can mitigate any possible adverse impact.

You do not need to tell your subscribers about a breach if you can demonstrate that the data was encrypted (or made unintelligible by a similar security measure).

If you do not tell your customers, the ICO can require you to do so if we consider the breach is likely to adversely affect them.

What do we need to record in our breach log?

You must also keep your own record of all personal data breaches in an inventory or log. It must contain:

  • the facts surrounding the breach;
  • the effects of the breach; and
  • remedial action taken.

We have produced a template log to help you record the information you need. We also ask you to submit your log (this form sets a cookie) to us on a monthly basis.

For more information, see our detailed guidance for service providers on notification of PECR security breaches.

Source: ICO Org

Democrats step up calls that Russian hack was act of war

Democratic lawmakers are publicly calling out Russia for engaging in war by meddling in the U.S. presidential election.

The Democrats have been particularly bullish in the wake of FBI Director James Comey’s disclosure that the bureau is investigating whether there was coordination between President Trump’s associates and Russia in the influence campaign, which involved leaking hacked personal emails from Democratic operatives to damage candidate Hillary Clinton.

The warfare accusations fit into a larger narrative pushed by Democrats that casts President Trump as weak on Russia and plays up the damage done by Moscow through the electoral interference.

The rhetoric also puts Republicans — who often characterize themselves as more hawkish on Russia and defense — in a bind as they try to defend to the new administration’s strategy on Russia.

“I think this attack that we’ve experienced is a form of war, a form of war on our fundamental democratic principles,” Coleman said during a hearing this week at the House Homeland Security Committee.

She lambasted Trump for his praise of Russian President Vladimir Putin, asking a panel of experts and former officials what message Trump’s “borderline dismissive attitude” toward Moscow’s cyberattack sends to the Kremlin and other nations.

Two other Democrats made similar charges at the House Intelligence Committee hearing where Comey testified.

An Act of Hybrid Warfare

“I actually think that their engagement was an act of war, an act of hybrid warfare, and I think that’s why the American people should be concerned about it,” said Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.).

“This past election, our country was attacked. We were attacked by Russia,” said Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.). “I see this as an opportunity for everyone on this committee, Republicans and Democrats, to not look in the rearview window but to look forward and do everything we can to make sure that our country never again allows a foreign adversary to attack us.”

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s ranking member, has similarly described the election meddling as an “attack” and likened it to the United States’ “political Pearl Harbor.”

Doug Heye, a former communications operative for former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), described the rhetoric as “alarmist” and indicative of partisan politics.

He said some lawmakers have raised good questions about potential ties between Trump associates and Russia, but that Democrats are largely trying to delegitimize Trump’s victory.

“The Democrats either still don’t believe or don’t want to send the message that they lost the election,” he said.

Michael Schmitt, an international law professor at the University of Exeter in Britain, told The Hill that public officials need to choose their words carefully to “control escalation.”

“I find that sort of talk dangerous,” said Schmitt, who led the team of legal experts that formulated the Tallinn Manual 2.0, a comprehensive analysis of how international law applies to cyberspace.

The Army’s top officer, Mark Milley, also cautioned individuals about using the term “war” to refer to the cyberattacks, saying at a conference on Tuesday, “If it’s an act of war, then you’ve got to start thinking of your response to that sort of thing.”

Democrats don’t appear to be calling for a military response to what they say was an act of war.

They’ve instead called for tightening sanctions on Moscow or creating an independent commission similar to the one that investigated the September 11, 2001, terror attacks.

Tougher Sanctions

“I’ll tell you what our next step should not be,” Swalwell told Fox News’s Tucker Carlson on Monday when pressed on what a “counterattack” should look like. “It should not be a warmer embrace of Russia, as the president clearly has intimated he wants to do. The sanctions should get tougher. We should expand NATO’s role, not contract it, and we should talk tough with Russia.”

The Trump administration has shown no signs of increasing sanctions or retaliating against Moscow by other means for the hacks.

Intelligence committees in both chambers of Congress are probing Russian interference in the presidential election. However, those investigations have been complicated by Trump’s unsubstantiated allegations that the Obama administration “wire tapped” Trump Tower and leaks to the press about investigations into contacts between Trump associates and Russian officials.

While Republicans have been less inclined to accuse Russia of warfare, one GOP Trump critic has said the hacking during the election amounted to an act of war.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) came out early with the charge in December, even before the U.S. intelligence community released its unclassified report on the election meddling.

“When you attack a country, it’s an act of war,” McCain, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said during an appearance on Ukrainian television. “And so we have to make sure that there is a price to pay so that we can perhaps persuade Russians to stop this kind of attacks on our very fundamentals of democracy.”

Congress does not yet have a clear handle on what defines war in cyberspace and has through annual defense policy legislation directed the new administration to spell out what actions in cyberspace may warrant a military response.

Schmitt assesses that the hacking campaign was not an act of war but rather a violation of two prohibitions: one on violating another state’s sovereignty and another on intervention into another state’s affairs.

“Without a scintilla of a doubt, it is not an act of war,” Schmitt said.

Source: TheHill

Thanks TechTarget, ICO Org, TheHill and for reading Data Breach Hack

IMAGE:  Melissa Anges “Your Guide for Data Breach Crisis Communication

Help Support Our Work

Like and Share on our Facebook page

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Dr Don
Founder/Admin The Internet Crime Fighters Org, Admin DrDony's Reviews,, Author The Internet Users Handbook, See more
Dr Don
Dr Don
Dr Don

Latest posts by Dr Don (see all)

Previous Post
Business Crime Security Home

Business Threats Online [Video]

Next Post
Business Child Family Crime Security Home

Data Protection Privacy [Video]


  1. Reply

    Why Feds Are So Confident Russia Was Behind the DNC Hack And Other Breaches

  2. Reply

    Star Wars card firm Topps hit by ‘unforgiveable’ hack

  3. Reply

    Stop calling everything a “hack” Nevada state government’s website was leaking thousands of social security numbers, and highly sensitive personal data. They said it was a hack. Spoiler alert: It wasn’t.

  4. Reply

    Hackers hit Star Wars collectable trading card firm Topps The firm is yet to clarify details of the hack, which may have seen users’ personal and sensitive information stolen.

  5. Reply

    United States: Data Breach Trends — 2016: The Year Of Ransomware

  6. Reply
  7. Reply

    Chicagoan gets prison for ‘Celebgate’ nude-photo hacking that judge calls ‘abhorrent’

  8. Reply

    Top data breach trends in 2016 — Phishing, skimming rise; hacking holds ground In a year marked by massive data breaches, trends report finds skimming and phishing made waves in 2016.

  9. Reply

    Hackers steal 2.5 million PlayStation and Xbox players’ details in major breach

  10. Reply

    Hackers steal 2.5 million PlayStation and Xbox players’ details in major breach

  11. Reply

    2.5 million Xbox and PlayStation gamers’ details hacked If they haven’t been careful about passwords and usernames, says one expert, it could be “game over for their personal data.”

  12. Reply

    PlayStation, Xbox HACKED: How to check if your email, passwords have been STOLEN HACKERS steal data from 2.5 million people, as unofficial Xbox and PlayStation forums are compromised.

  13. Reply


    Data breach

    The UK’s 15 most infamous data breaches Software vulnerabilities, lost hard drives and CDs, malicious insiders, poor security – the UK’s most important data breaches reveal just how many ways data can be put at risk

    The 10 Biggest Data Breaches Of 2016 (So Far)

    2016 Data Breach Investigations Report: It’s back, and it’s more insightful than ever.

    These were the biggest hacks, leaks and data breaches of 2016

    2016 Ponemon Cost of Data Breach Study

    Security breaches

    11 data breaches that stung US consumers

    Data Breach


    ARTICLES Data Breach Since 2005

    Revealed Yahoo hack considered largest data breach in history

    The 10 biggest hacks, breaches, and security stories of 2016

    The Year’s Biggest Hacks, From Yahoo To the DNC

    World’s Biggest Data Breaches

  14. Reply

    Bell breach may have exposed over 1 million new email addresses to phishing and spam An estimate suggests 60% of the leaked email addresses haven’t appeared in other data breaches before

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *